Author | Editor Jiang Hua | Zou Chunxia
Obviously, he was in the front line of flood fighting, but he was falsely accused of leaving his post without permission. Fortunately, the Commission for Discipline Inspection took action to dispose of the falsely accused.
Since the beginning of this year, Fuzhou Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection of Fujian province has continuously investigated and dealt with three cases involving false accusations against discipline violations involving grassroots cadres in counties and cities such as Fujian and Qing dynasties, Changle and Minhou, and dealt with the relevant framers according to law.
It is not uncommon in real life for cadres to be falsely accused. One data for reference is that since the 18th National Congress of Maoming, Guangdong province, 1692 party members and cadres who were wrongly accused and falsely accused have clarified their right and wrong.
Zheng knew (WeChat ID:upolitics) that he was very curious about the motives of the fraudsters. After understanding, he found that there were really a variety of reasons. Some cadres falsely accused others for their own supremacy, and some people were purely contradictory and deliberately attacked for revenge, there are also “writing and playing”.
Provincial Party secretary was falsely accused
The determination of “false accusation and frame-up behavior” by the regulations office of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection refers to deliberately fabricating the fact that others violate discipline and law, and making false reports to relevant organs, organizations or leading cadres of the party and the state, the act intended to make others investigated by Party discipline and state law.
The three cases reported by Fuzhou Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection mainly involve grassroots cadres. The cadre mentioned at the beginning who is in the front line of flood fighting is a village director. However, cadres falsely accused in real life cover all levels from village to province.
Zheng knew (WeChat ID:upolitics) that as early as 2008, Qi Peiwen, the head of the second inspection team of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, the former Standing Committee of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, disclosed publicly that someone falsely accused the secretary of the provincial Party committee.
Qi Peiwen introduced that there was a province. As soon as the secretary of the Provincial Party Committee arrived in this province, someone wrote to him. They investigated and found that several things reported were Zhang Guanli Dai. For example, he gave a piece of land to his brother. In fact, he had no brother, and he gave it to others before he came. The investigation found that the facts were specious, out of nothing, and some were fabricated. At the meeting that fed back the inspection situation, the inspection team also gave the secretary a name.
Pre-post publicity is vulnerable to false accusation
When do cadres usually happen when they are falsely accused? Pre-term publicity, especially before promotion.
The publicity period is special. In June 2015, Hubei announced three outstanding county Party secretary candidates. Before the publicity, a county Party committee secretary was investigated, and there was no report in many channels before. After the publicity, the number of reports suddenly increased. According to the analysis, when reporting during publicity, relevant departments will conduct investigations, aiming at interfering with or suspending the Post-Office of Public cadres.
Officials not only have normal reports after publicity, but also may cause false accusations. In May 2015, Zhang Hongzhi, the county head of Xiangfen county, Linfen city, Shanxi province, was publicized as the secretary of the county Party committee. Someone in the local area wrote to Wang Ruolin, the then secretary of the Shanxi Provincial Party Committee, and reported him, saying that in order to be the county Party committee secretary, he bribed the leaders of the Linfen municipal Party committee. After investigation, it was found that the report was a false accusation, and the person who made the false accusation was the director of the original cultural relics bureau of Linfen city. He was “double opened” and transferred to the judiciary.
Why Zhang Hongzhi was falsely accused? The explanation often cited was surprising: “It is written for fun”.
Send more than 1300 false letters within 3 months
Different from the frequent introduction, the purpose of most false tellers to commit false accusation is very clear.
Some are for personal promotion; Some are for pulling the boss down; Some are for revenge because of contradictions. The methods of false accusation are also various: some directly write report letters to the provincial Party committee secretary; Some invite many people to make joint complaints and bring the report letters to Hong Kong and send them online; Others dare to report them to the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection in real name, more than 1,000 reporting letters were mailed to relevant departments within 3 months.
Zheng knew (WeChat ID:upolitics) that the person who wrote Crazy letters was Zhang Jingli, the former deputy director of the State Food and Drug Administration. He thinks that as long as the leader falls down, the deputy director himself can turn positive as soon as possible. To this end, he asked people to search around for some so-called “problems”.
Zhang Jingli once instructed the legal representative of a company to deliberately fabricate the fact that the leader once asked others to do business and gave others property, and reported the real name to the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and other departments. He also deliberately fabricated facts such as the leader’s power for personal gains and bribery, and instructed others to mail false letters to the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and other departments and relevant leaders, sending more than 1,300 letters in total within 3 months.
So crazy, the consequences are naturally quite serious. Zhang Jingli was charged with bribery, false accusation, and illegal business operation, and was sentenced to 17 years in prison.
First notice of “false accusation against others”
Since the 18th National Congress of the CPC, there have been those who have been publicly exposed.
On January this year, the website of the supervision department of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection released a message: recently, with the approval of the Shenyang Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China, the Shenyang Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection conducted a case review on Li Yinghua, the executive deputy director of the administrative committee of Shenyang-EU economic development zone, for serious problem of discipline violation. The issues related to Li Yinghua in this bulletin include violating organizational discipline and falsely accusing others for personal promotion.
In previous reports, “false accusation against others” rarely appeared directly.
In October, 2016, the Commission for Discipline Inspection of Longyan city, Fujian province reported the serious problem of discipline violation of Zhu Shimin, a member and cadre of the Standing Committee of the People’s Congress of Zhangping city, which involved false accusation, but did not directly use the expression “false accusation against others.
The report pointed out that Zhu Shimin seriously violated the organizational discipline, and because the house demolition did not realize personal improper interests, he released his personal anger to the former director of the Standing Committee of Zhangping Municipal People’s Congress, who was the leader of the relocation working group, even in order to achieve the purpose of punishment of the original expedition, the petition report of the corrupt plot was fabricated and fabricated, and even incited by means of SMS, network, letter, petition, etc, instigate unidentified persons to participate in the so-called joint report.
The official website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection once issued a document pointing out that the false accusation must be approved by the Party committee or commission for discipline inspection at or above the prefecture level (including prefecture level); If the false accusation occurs due to incomplete understanding of the facts, the right and wrong should be clarified within a certain range, the influence on the wrongly accused should be eliminated, and the wrongly accused should be educated.
False accusation and false accusation are different, but deliberately fabricating facts, false accusation and framing others must be false accusation.
Falsely accused or in prison
Falsely accuse others, even if you say you write to play, you have to bear the consequences. Article 69 of the regulations on disciplinary actions of the Communist Party of China stipulates:
If a false accusation is intended to cause others to be subject to disciplinary investigation, a warning or serious warning will be given;
If the circumstances are serious, they shall be given the punishment of revoking their positions within the party or visiting the party;
If the circumstances are serious, the party shall be expelled.
Article 239 of the criminal law:
Fabricated facts falsely accuse and frame others with the intention of making others subject to criminal investigation. If the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or control;
Those who cause serious consequences shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years.
It is particularly emphasized that if the staff of state organs commit this crime, they will be punished severely.
In the end, those who falsely accused were also punished as they deserved.
On October 21, 2009, the Fuxin Municipal Party Committee of Liaoning province received a report letter to report that the deputy secretary of the political and legal committee of Fuxin municipal party committee was involved in drug abuse, rape, gathering of people and fornication, etc. The investigation proved that the fact of reporting did not exist, and the whistleblower Hongxiang was detained in criminal detention and was canceled by the National People’s Congress representative capacity.
In August, 2009, an online post about Ma liangzhao, the secretary of the district committee of Gaoming district, Foshan city, accepting bribes caused a sensation. After investigation, the content of the online post was fabricated and released by Liang Ruiqiang, the former deputy district chief of Gaoming district, Foshan, Guangdong province, together with Liang Weixiong and Lin Jianbo, with the intention of falsely accusing Ma liangzhao, and the three were finally sentenced to several years in prison.
In these three cases reported by Fujian province, two framed persons were officials and were given disciplinary measures to warn within the party.
2976
author | Editor Jiang Hua | Zou Chunxia was falsely accused of leaving his post without permission when he was in the front line of flood fighting. Fortunately, the Commission for Discipline Inspection took action to dispose of the fraudsters. Since the beginning of this year, Fuzhou Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection of Fujian province has investigated and dealt with three grassroots cadres in counties and cities including Minqing, Changle and Minhou.